You should change trying to fall to falling (which is what it does in Newtonian mechanics). Also, th

One of the most difficult things to learn about physics is the concept of force. Just because there is a force on something does not mean it will be moving in the direction of the force. Instead, the force influences the motion to be a bit more in the direction of the force than it was before.
For example, if you roll a bowling ball straight down a lane, then run up beside it and kick it towards the gutter, you apply a force towards the gutter, but the ball doesn't go straight into the gutter. Instead it keeps going down the lane, but picks up a little bit of diagonal motion as well.
Imagine you're standing at the edge of a cliff 100m tall. If you drop a rock off, it will fall straight down because it had no velocity to begin with, so the only velocity it picks up is downward from the downward force.
If you throw the rock out horizontally, it will still fall, but it will keep moving out horizontally as it does so, and falls at an angle. (The angle isn't constant - the shape is a curve called a parabola, but that's relatively unimportant here.) The the force is straight down, but that force doesn't stop the rock from moving horizontally.
Now imagine throwing the rock so hard it travels one kilometer horizontally before it hits the ground. If you do that, something slightly new happens. The rock still falls, but it has to fall more than just 100m before it hits the ground. The reason is that the Earth is curved, and so as the rock traveled out that kilometer, the Earth was actually curving away underneath of it. In one kilometer, it turns out the Earth curves away by about 10 centimeters - a small difference, but a real one.
As you throw the rock even harder than that, the curving away of the Earth underneath becomes more significant. If you could throw the rock 10 kilometers, the Earth would now curve away by 10 meters, and for a 100 km throw the Earth curves away by an entire kilometer. Now the stone has to fall a very long way down compared to the 100m cliff it was dropped from.
What it shows is that if you could throw the rock hard enough, the Earth would curve away from underneath the rock so much that the rock actually never gets any closer to the ground. It goes all the way around in the circle and might hit you in the back of the head!
This is an orbit. It's what satellites and the moon are doing. We can't actually do it here close to the surface of the Earth due to wind resistance, but on the surface of the moon, where there's no atmosphere, you could indeed have a very low orbit.
Gravity gets weaker as you go further out. The Earth's gravity online hotel reservations in montreal is much weaker at the moon than at a low-earth orbit satellite. Because gravity is so much weaker at the moon, the moon orbits much more slowly than the International Space Station, for example. The moon takes one month to go around. The ISS takes a few hours. An interesting consequence is that if you go out just the right amount in between, about six Earth radii, you reach a point where gravity is weakened enough that an orbit around the Earth takes 24 hours. There, you could have a "geosynchronous orbit", a satellite that orbits so that it stays above the same spot on Earth's equator as Earth spins.
Although online hotel reservations in montreal gravity gets weaker as you go further out, there is no cut-off distance. In theory, gravity extends forever. However, if you went towards the sun, eventually the sun's gravity would be stronger than the Earth's, and then you wouldn't fall back to Earth any more, even lacking the speed to orbit. That would happen if you went about .1% of the distance to the sun, or about 250,000 km, or 40 Earth radii. (This is actually online hotel reservations in montreal less than the distance to the moon, but the moon doesn't fall into the Sun because it's orbiting the sun, just like the Earth itself is.)
So the moon "falls" toward Earth due to gravity, online hotel reservations in montreal but doesn't get any closer to Earth because its motion is an orbit, and the dynamics of the orbit are determined by the strength of gravity at that distance and by Newton's laws of motion.
The first sentence contradicts itself in that orbital motion is a state of free fall toward the center of attraction. Then, in the final paragraph, the first sentence contradicts the very first sentence. A beginner would have a difficult time with this logic. JoeH Jan 14 at 17:05
No, it doesn t contradict itself. Fall to Earth means, to any cognizant reader, the same as crash into Earth in that sentence. Further, this phrasing mimics the language of the question. Words like fall can mean different things in contexts. Most people are able to understand this. Mark Eichenlaub online hotel reservations in montreal Jan 14 at 20:45
It is indeed contradictory. Falling to Earth and crashing into Earth are two entirely different things. A ball can fall without crashing into Earth, but it cannot crash into Earth without first falling. Words, especially in physics, must be as unambiguous as possible. And by the way, I m quite cognizant thank you. JoeH Jan 15 at 14:09
In general, in an inverse square central force field one can calculate the trajectory of a particle and verify that the trajectory is either a parabola or ellipse or hyperbola (conic sections) depending online hotel reservations in montreal upon the initial position and initial momentum of the particle. For a two body system with certain initial conditions, it is a stable elliptical orbit. In case of the sun and the earth it is an ellipse (ignoring gravitation of other objects and also ignoring the relativistic precision of orbit).
Gravity is perpendicular to the moon's speed, so it changes the direction and not the magnitude of the speed itself. $L=mv\times R$ and if $L$, $m$ and $v$ are constant, $R$ must remain constant online hotel reservations in montreal as well, so the radius doesn't change.
I agree, but there is some sleight of hand going on in the phrase gravity is perpendicular to the moon s speed , which itself essentially assumes a circular orbit. Mark Eichenlaub Apr 24 '11 at 19:39
To understand this, think of whirling a rock, tied to the end of a string, around and around, with your hand just above your head. As the rock travels online hotel reservations in montreal in circles it is constantly being pulled toward you by the force on the string online hotel reservations in montreal (which is like Earth's pull of gravity on the moon). Why doesn't the rock come bonk you on the head, if you are constantly pulling it toward your head? The answer is that the rock is always trying to change its velocity vector to come do just that; but the change is only enough to just keep it in a circular path, like the pull on the Moon is just enough online hotel reservations in montreal to keep it in a circular orbit around Earth.
You should change trying to fall to falling (which is what it does in Newtonian mechanics). Also, the path is elliptic, not circular (but it eccentricity is indeed very close to 1). ysap May 17 '11 at 23:10
The Moon does not fall towards Earth right now because Earth rotates itself. The energy from the Earth's own rotation online hotel reservations in montreal around its axis is gradually tranferred into energy online hotel reservations in montreal of the Moon's orbital motion. That's why the Earth's rotating speed decreases but the distance to the Moon increases.
This process will continue until Earth's proper rotation will slow to the point where it has the same angular velocity as the Moon's orbital motion. From that moment on the Moon will start to gradually approach Earth.
But it d never get there ... the Earth would start rotating faster until it was in lunasyncronous rotation (always keeping the same face to the moon), at which point the Moon would stop falling. Peter Shor Apr 24 '11 at 15:37
The best simple answer I can think of are this: An orbit of one body of an another is essentially a degree of balance among forces, real and fictitious. These would include centripetal force (gravity) attracting the orbiting body ("the fall") and centrifugal force which arises out of the orbiting body's inertia (the orbiting body's tendency to remain in a constant linear motion online hotel reservations in montreal away from the body it is orbiting). In General Relativistic terms, the orbit is the result of a body moving in a straight line through the curved space that exists around the more massive body. If the lesser body moves with the sufficient combination of momentum and distance online hotel reservations in montreal it will continue to pass the more massive body onto other regions of space. If that combination is not sufficient to overcome the curvature of space in the region around the more massive body then the lesser body will continue it's tendency to travel in a straight line but it must it do so in a curved space that it cannot "escape". If it has a sufficient minimum momentum, it's tendency to move in a straight line away from the more massive body will overcome the downward curvature. These two conditions will cause the lesser body, per Newton, to become the perpetual satellite of the more massive body because the lesser body must stay in motion unless an equal and opposite force is applied to it's motion. The lesser body doesn't experience resistance from friction or air in space and the gravitational force is perpendicular, not opposite to the motion of the lesser body so absent an equal and opposite force, the lesser body continues its trek about the more massive body indefinitely while it's momentum is in balance with the massive body's gravity.
as we know that the moon is revolving online hotel reservations in montreal around the earth in circular path where centripetal force is developed by the gravitation and then outward online hotel reservations in montreal force the outcome of the circular motion "centrifugal force is balancing the centripetal force.