Having said all that, I d be interested in your view as to whether, since the NCAA already threw the

The LA County Assessors office has provided the NCAA with emails related to extra benefits car rentals in memphis which were allegedly provided to former USC student-athletes Joe McKnight and Davon Jefferson by Scott Schenter:
The Times obtained Schenter s work emails from the assessor s office under the California Public Records Act. A May 2008 email from Delta Air Lines to Schenter includes a receipt for his purchase of a $625 flight from Los Angeles to New Orleans. The listed passenger: Joe McKnight. Schenter also told The Times that he gave McKnight a Chevrolet Monte Carlo, which was referred to in a 2009 email from an automobile insurance agent.
Getting documentation of violations is always car rentals in memphis one of the NCAA s major challenges. In this case, the extra benefits being tied up in a corruption scandal involving a municipal office makes it easy for the NCAA to obtain emails and paper records, since the NCAA can use public records requests just as the LA Times did.
Then again, whether the benefits were provided and whether they were impermissible do not seem to be at issue. The bigger car rentals in memphis question is how the NCAA treats a case involving violations that occurred around the same time as a much larger infractions case. The most relevant car rentals in memphis thing in these emails would be anything which shows that USC staff members were involved.
car rentals in memphis You indicated that the only question is how the NCAA treats violations that occurred around the same time No, this really shouldn car rentals in memphis t be an issue. It s like double jeopardy. The NCAA already USC with its stiffest penalty a claim of Lack of Institutional Control. And the NCAA penalized USC so severely that even you say the punishment can t be squared with any precedent (including the recent Central Florida ruling). And I don t have the definition in front of me, but I ve looked at it before, and it s basically a charge that the institution didn t have sufficienct controls in place to detect wrongdoing or were somehow complicit.
If what the NCAA says is true that SC lacked institutional controls the McKnight thing seems to only be further confirmation of the overarching allegation (if it s even true). My understanding, however, of some of the emails is that there are acnkowledgements car rentals in memphis that USC tried to stop Schenter from having contact and he said that SC couldn t stop him. In other words, the school attempted to get this guy out of the picture, but he persisted.
Having said all that, I d be interested in your view as to whether, since the NCAA already threw the book at USC with a claim of Lack of Institutional Control, the NCAA really car rentals in memphis has any basis for further punishing USC. If so, if each individual infraction is treated with separate penalties after an LOIC claim has been established, then the University of Miami is in deep trouble. What, weren t there something in excess of 70 athletes involved? If the NCAA then followed precedent, car rentals in memphis which we know it doesn t, that school s football program would be shut down .for years. I forget, where was Paul Dee the AD again?
Kosar Lets Slip Possible Miami Scholarship Restrictions NCAA Loosens Permission car rentals in memphis to Contact a Very Tiny Bit Ok State Camp Loophole Unlikely to Last For Long Important to Know Who Suggested Half-Game Suspension for Manziel Chris Walker Runs Out of Time To Join Gators in Fall
The Bylaw Blog is written by John Infante. He is a former compliance officer at NCAA Division I schools and has been running the Bylaw Blog for over 2 years. His expertise has been featured on ESPN, Sports Illustrated, USA Today and numerous other media outlets.