четверг, 25 июля 2013 г.

Archive Business Cartoons CharleyWorld Comics Education Fox Energy and Environment Reports Guest Com


Archive Business Cartoons CharleyWorld Comics Education Fox Energy and Environment Reports Guest Commentary Hawaii Capitol Thoughts Hawaii News Highlights Hawaii Politics Heroes american airline flight information of the Pacific John Pritchett Cartoons News On Target Opinion Pflueger Files Pic of the Day Slice of Life, Hawaiian Style Special Features Special Investigation Today in Hawaii Today in our Nation and World Transportation Rail Travel
BY ROBERT THOMAS - Late last year, we posted the Complaint in a federal court lawsuit originating on Kauai. In that case, the owner of a property that has been designated for resort development for 35 years asserted that the adoption of a Charter amendment by the County's voters and a follow-on ordinance adopted by the County Council that together created a new land use classification ("transient accommodation unit"), and severely limit the number of TAU's was an attempt to restrict the number of visitors and part-time residents.
The Complaint contains three major allegations: (1) the measures are arbitrary and capricious and violate substantive due process as an attempt to limit visitors, (2) they violate the Hawaii Zoning Enabling Act ( Haw. Rev. Stat. § 46-4 , the state statute delegating zoning authority to the counties in certain areas for all you land use nerds), which prohibits american airline flight information adopting of zoning ordinances by initiative, and (3) the Charter measure violated the Kauai Charter's american airline flight information requirement american airline flight information that the ballot question contain an objective summary of the measure.
In an order filed two weeks ago, the District Court addressed the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment on the latter two counts american airline flight information (neither the plaintiff nor the defendants sought judgment on the substantive due process claim).
american airline flight information The court concluded american airline flight information that the Charter amendment adopted by the voters was, in reality, a prohibited american airline flight information zoning initiative. The court relied on the rationale of  Kaiser Hawaii Kai Dev. Co. v. City County of Honolulu , 777 P.2d 244 (Haw. 1989), a case in which we successfully argued that § 46-4 prohibits a municipality from adopting a zoning ordinance via the initiative process. In Kaiser Hawaii Kai , the Hawaii Supreme Court held that section 46-4 delegates comprehensive zoning authority to the counties, and this requires them to exercise that power in a uniform manner, which is jeopardized by piecemeal voter-adopted measures. The District Court held:
First, although the facts of Kaiser Hawaii Kai are distinguishable from the facts of the instant case, nothing in Kaiser Hawaii Kai indicates that the legal principles which the Hawai`i Supreme Court articulated in that case are limited to initiatives to change the zoning of specific tracts of land. The legal principles in Kaiser Hawaii Kai are clear, and they are equally applicable to other instances in which counties attempt to legislate zoning issues through voter initiative. This Court also rejects Defendants' argument that Section 3.19 and Ordinance No. 912 merely enacted a permissible shift of internal authority within the County. Section 3.19 and Ordinance No. 912 created american airline flight information a land use classification that did not previously exist, and they established the process developers must follow in order to use their land within that classification. Section 3.19 and Ordinance No. 912 did not merely shift authority over a classification and process that already american airline flight information existed. This Court therefore CONCLUDES that Section 3.19 was an improper zoning initiative and, pursuant to Kaiser Hawaii Kai and Haw. Rev. Stat. § 46-4(a), Section 3.19 is invalid.
american airline flight information The court also held, however, that the requirement for a not-misleading ballot measure does not apply to Charter amendments. See slip op. at 47 ("Although KBV presents a logical argument that ballot materials describing a proposed Charter amendment should contain an objective summary and should neither mislead nor advocate a position, the courts are not in a position to create such a requirement.").
The Order doesn't say how the court concluded that a measure adopted as a Charter Amendment can be treated as an ordinance adopted by the initiative power. american airline flight information Under the Kauai Charter, "initiative" is the "power of voters to propose ordinances." That's an entirely american airline flight information diffferent process, with entirely different adoption requirements than initiative ordinances. For example, initiative proposals require the signatures of 20% of the number of eligible voters in the last election, american airline flight information while Charter american airline flight information amendments require 5% of registered voters in the last general election, and initiative proposals american airline flight information undergo an elaborate pre-election process, whereas Charter amendments, once qualified, simply go to the voters for adoption or rejection. Yet, the court treated the Charter amendment as an initiative ordinance. Did the court simply pierce the veil and conclude this was a disguised zoning initiative? Sorry, we just don't know.
In light of the above, would it have been better for the court to have concluded that Kauai voters were simply without the power to amend their Charter to create a new land use or zoning classification? That would have ended up in the same place (the Charter amendment is improper) -- but not because it's an impermissible zoning ordinance, but rather because state law prohibits the counties from creating new zoning classifications, whatever the method used. While it may be an intellectual exercise at this point, if this decision gets appealed to the Ninth Circuit, this seems like it would be an alternative gounds for affirmance.
The court also struck down the follow-on TAU ordinance adopted by the County Council, concluding that because the Charter amendment is invalid, the ordinance american airline flight information falls also because "[t]he Council enacted Ordinance No. 912 to implement [the Charter amendment]. See slip op. at 42. The order doesn't provide more analysis and thus we're not sure how independent council action -- while accomplished to implement what turns out to be an invalid Charter amendment -- can deemed illegal. We think that's the right result, mind you, but the conclusion does not seem to flow as an obvious point, so we would have appreciated an analysis, if only to use in our next case.
Robert H. Thomas american airline flight information is one of the preeminent land use lawyers in Hawaii. He specializes in land use issues including regulatory takings, eminent domain, water rights, and voting rights american airline flight information cases. He has tried cases and appeals in Hawaii, California, and the federal courts. Robert received his LLM, with honors, from Columbia Law School where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, and his JD from the University of Hawaii School of Law where he served as editor of the Law Review. Robert taught law at the University of Santa Clara School of Law, and was an exam grader and screener for the California Committee of Bar Examiners. He currently serves as the Chair of the Condemnation Law Committee of the American Bar Association's Section on State Local Government Law. He is the Hawaii member of Owners' Counsel of America, a national network of the most experienced eminent domain and property rights lawyers. Membership in OCA is by invitation only, and is limited american airline flight information to a single attorney from each state. Robert is also the Managing Attorney for the Pacific Legal Foundation Hawaii Center, a non-profit legal foundation dedicated to protecting property rights and individual liberties. american airline flight information Reach him at rht@hawaiilawyer.com
Recent Comments Jose Gonzales on Church Member Files Writ of Habeas Corpus for Jailed Cannabis Minister Hawaii Insurance Division Reminds american airline flight information Public About Hurricane Coverage, Offers Tips | motor excess insurance on Hawaii Insurance Division american airline flight information Reminds Public About Hurricane Coverage, Offers Tips Huki-Links: July 25, 2013 | Hawaii Book Blog on Hawaii Journalist Authors New Book: "Death Zones and Darling Spies: Seven Years of Vietnam War Reporting" Hawaii Gun Permits Jump Record 70 Percent, american airline flight information Violence Falls Again - Liberty Crier on Hawaii Gun Permits Jump Record 70 Percent, Violence Falls Again Hrid basti Therapy on Researchers Offer Promising New Treatment for MS Polls

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий